The catching up since that last holders is the hardest part, when I took over the office of Registrar, I had to go back at least five years, updating records. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > I was elected to the office in that last big batch of elections (I *think* > we got the resolutions done correctly now!). > > I'm happy to give it up, it was mainly because no one else volunteered. > There were several ribbon awards given recently and you might want to > wait until I catch it up (was planning to do so in the next couple days). > > On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: >> On Sat, 2017-09-23 at 15:26 -0400, ATMunn . wrote: >>> One office that I could go for that doesn't seem too difficult is the >>> Tailor. If an election for it comes up, I'll definitely vote for >>> myself. >>> (Or could I deputize for it? I still don't fully understand the >>> deputisation thing) >> >> It became vacant when I deregistered, and I'm not sure anyone's taken >> it yet? >> >> However, the report, despite being due, isn't actually overdue yet >> (that won't happen until October), so a deputisation attempt would fail >> rule 2160 condition 2. This seems like a problem in the rules to me; if >> the office is vacant, there's no reason to expect its tasks to be done >> on time. >> >> -- >> ais523 >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
