Just wait and see...
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com



> On Sep 23, 2017, at 9:26 AM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This got out of hand quickly
> 
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Perfectly legitimate usage, just wondering.
> ----
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> > On Sep 23, 2017, at 7:44 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > forum shopping tbh.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> Why did you bar me and not o?
> >> ----
> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:47 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I call a CFJ with the following statement: "The Green card o. issued
> >>> emself in the below message was illegally issued, as the green card e
> >>> issued nichdel was legally issued".
> >>>
> >>> I think the most natural reading of "that reason" is the act itself,
> >>> not the particular rule breached. That is, someone can be carded twice
> >>> for breaking the same pledge on two totally seperate occasions. There
> >>> is also a question as to the interpretation of the pledge rule itself.
> >>> It says "a pledge is considered broken if...", which may mean that the
> >>> pledge is permanently broken, and cannot be broken more than once.
> >>>
> >>> I bar Publius and use AP.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote:
> >>>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 11:45 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> As for the gerontocracy argument: Money is an inherently gerontocratic
> >>>>> system. It abstracts value from labor in a way that allows arbitrary
> >>>>> allocation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm about 95% sure this is the gist of my partner’s argument when she 
> >>>>> said
> >>>>> “inventing money is _rude_” about the original Shinies proposal.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I’m not sure I fully appreciated Spending Power while we had it. The 
> >>>>> debate
> >>>>> and adoption predates me. I’ve long had a fascination with 
> >>>>> throughput-based
> >>>>> monetary systems like Total Annihilation’s metal economy, where the 
> >>>>> driving
> >>>>> numbers are the amount of money in per time, not the amount of money in 
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> pile, and SP is as close as I’ve ever seen to that in a political 
> >>>>> system.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 12:30 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I point the finger at nichdel. He replied to CB in discussion again.
> >>>>
> >>>> As recently discussed, this is over a pledge under rule 2450, made by 
> >>>> nichdel, which reads:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I pledge to not acknowledge any messages Cuddle Beam sends to a-d, or 
> >>>>> to respond in a-d to anything CB does.
> >>>>
> >>>> This pledge was previously broken, and punishment for that breach issued 
> >>>> from this office on Sep 20, 2017, at 1:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time.
> >>>>
> >>>> The message quoted above is, indeed, in response to a message from 
> >>>> Cuddlebeam, and violates the above-quoted pledge. Issuing a second card 
> >>>> for the same pledge appears to violate rule 2426, which reads in part:
> >>>>
> >>>>> A person SHALL NOT issue a Card unless:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> …
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * there has not already been a Card issued for that reason; and
> >>>>
> >>>> Therefore, as issuing a card would be ILLEGAL, I find this 
> >>>> finger-pointing to be Shenanigans.
> >>>>
> >>>> I issue nichdel a green card by summary judgement, as required by rule 
> >>>> 2478, for violating rule 2450.
> >>>>
> >>>> I issue myself a green card by summary judgement for violating rule 
> >>>> 2426, as cited above.
> >>>>
> >>>> I’ll note that I’ve now issued nichdel a card by summary judgement twice 
> >>>> in a week, and myself a card twice in a week. It is no longer possible 
> >>>> for me to card either of us for the remainder of the week, rules 
> >>>> requiring me to do so notwithstanding.
> >>>>
> >>>> -o
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> From V.J. Rada
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From V.J. Rada
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to