Why did you bar me and not o? ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 23, 2017, at 2:47 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I call a CFJ with the following statement: "The Green card o. issued > emself in the below message was illegally issued, as the green card e > issued nichdel was legally issued". > > I think the most natural reading of "that reason" is the act itself, > not the particular rule breached. That is, someone can be carded twice > for breaking the same pledge on two totally seperate occasions. There > is also a question as to the interpretation of the pledge rule itself. > It says "a pledge is considered broken if...", which may mean that the > pledge is permanently broken, and cannot be broken more than once. > > I bar Publius and use AP. > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> On Sep 22, 2017, at 11:45 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> As for the gerontocracy argument: Money is an inherently gerontocratic >>> system. It abstracts value from labor in a way that allows arbitrary >>> allocation. >>> >>> I'm about 95% sure this is the gist of my partner’s argument when she said >>> “inventing money is _rude_” about the original Shinies proposal. >>> >>> I’m not sure I fully appreciated Spending Power while we had it. The debate >>> and adoption predates me. I’ve long had a fascination with throughput-based >>> monetary systems like Total Annihilation’s metal economy, where the driving >>> numbers are the amount of money in per time, not the amount of money in the >>> pile, and SP is as close as I’ve ever seen to that in a political system. >> >> On Sep 23, 2017, at 12:30 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I point the finger at nichdel. He replied to CB in discussion again. >> >> As recently discussed, this is over a pledge under rule 2450, made by >> nichdel, which reads: >> >>> I pledge to not acknowledge any messages Cuddle Beam sends to a-d, or to >>> respond in a-d to anything CB does. >> >> This pledge was previously broken, and punishment for that breach issued >> from this office on Sep 20, 2017, at 1:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time. >> >> The message quoted above is, indeed, in response to a message from >> Cuddlebeam, and violates the above-quoted pledge. Issuing a second card for >> the same pledge appears to violate rule 2426, which reads in part: >> >>> A person SHALL NOT issue a Card unless: >>> >>> … >>> >>> * there has not already been a Card issued for that reason; and >> >> Therefore, as issuing a card would be ILLEGAL, I find this finger-pointing >> to be Shenanigans. >> >> I issue nichdel a green card by summary judgement, as required by rule 2478, >> for violating rule 2450. >> >> I issue myself a green card by summary judgement for violating rule 2426, as >> cited above. >> >> I’ll note that I’ve now issued nichdel a card by summary judgement twice in >> a week, and myself a card twice in a week. It is no longer possible for me >> to card either of us for the remainder of the week, rules requiring me to do >> so notwithstanding. >> >> -o >> > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
