I think a MAY is only ever truly useful as an exception, if there's a default "CAN but SHALL NOT/MAY NOT" in place somewhere else.
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > Ah, I see. I don't see how useful a solitary MAY is then aside from being a > stealth "CANNOT" in a way. > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > If it's SHALL and MAY, without providing a method for doing it, if > it's an > > unregulated action that's OK imo > > By R2125 clause(1), putting in a SHALL or MAY automatically makes it > regulated > > (er, "restricted", was the title of the rule changed by the regulated > -> restricted > switchover). > > > > > >
