Ah, I see. I don't see how useful a solitary MAY is then aside from being a stealth "CANNOT" in a way.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > If it's SHALL and MAY, without providing a method for doing it, if it's > an > > unregulated action that's OK imo > > By R2125 clause(1), putting in a SHALL or MAY automatically makes it > regulated > > (er, "restricted", was the title of the rule changed by the regulated -> > restricted > switchover). > > > >