Rule changes have to be sequential. Ossification aside, you need both Instrument definitions and some kind of combination of r105/106 or the Proposal stops functioning mid-way. I'm not sure there's a repeal order that wouldn't leave at least one rule as a broken remnant. (Assuming there was a meta-agreement that you didn't suddenly start ignoring precedent on things like rule change order when the judicial system was repealed).
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:21 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > any proposal doing that would get failed bc of ossifying agora though right? > > That proposal could repeal that rule. > > -o > >
