On 09/06/17 18:47, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I think that's great for Agora but if its based on a CFJ or tradition,
> that's more of the "implicit rules" (or "obscure rules") phenomenon
> which I dislike. Conditional-ing stuff is as powerful as a real
> mechanic imo, and one of the most powerful ones. Luckily proposals are
> real cheap now, and I get rewarded for making good proposals, time to
> make it explicit! I'll pend this next week once I get APs back.
>
> If adding conditions to actions performed via fora is a mechanic which
> is explicitly acknowledged to exist in CFJs but not in the current
> Rules, I create the following Proposal:
>
> Name: "Conditionaling" actions is a very useful mechanic
> Content: Add to the rule "Fora" the following as a new paragraph at
> the bottom of the rule:
>
> "Actions can be stated to be performed conditionally, if such
> conditions are evaluable (by any player, with a reasonable amount of
> effort) at the time it is stated and at any future moment from then.

If adopted this proposal would have no effect. Default AI is 1.0, which
is too low to amend Fora.

>
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Aris Merchant
> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com
> <mailto:thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Oh, no, we definitely have conditional actioning (consider that a
>     nonce). The condition just has to be evaluable at the time it is said,
>     so no future conditionals. At least, that's my understanding.
>
>     -Aris
>
>     On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:cuddleb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > Note: we have explicit conditional voting, but not conditional
>     explicit
>     > action-doing in general.
>     >
>     > I'm in favor of conditional action-doing in general because it's
>     another
>     > useful tool for doing stuff (...and the rules are silent on the
>     issue).
>     >
>     > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Aris Merchant
>     > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> If there are no regulations, no part of this message beyond this
>     >> paragraph has any effect.
>     >>
>     >> I determine the regulations for the recent tournament to be in
>     title
>     >> T1-2017, or, if that title name is invalid, 1-2017. If I am
>     Regkeepor,
>     >> this is the official designation for that title; otherwise, I
>     deputize
>     >> for the Regkeepor to assign this designation.
>     >>
>     >> I then assign the ID T1-2017-1 (or, if that is invalid,
>     1-2017-1) to
>     >> the only regulation in that title. If I am still not Regkeepor, I
>     >> deputize for Regkeepor to do so, and then repeat the actions
>     attempted
>     >> in the previous paragraph.
>     >>
>     >> In accordance with Rule 2464, I repeal each regulation in title
>     >> T1-2017 (or, if invalid, 1-2017).
>     >>
>     >> -Aris
>     >
>     >
>
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to