Oh, no, we definitely have conditional actioning (consider that a nonce). The condition just has to be evaluable at the time it is said, so no future conditionals. At least, that's my understanding.
-Aris On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Note: we have explicit conditional voting, but not conditional explicit > action-doing in general. > > I'm in favor of conditional action-doing in general because it's another > useful tool for doing stuff (...and the rules are silent on the issue). > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If there are no regulations, no part of this message beyond this >> paragraph has any effect. >> >> I determine the regulations for the recent tournament to be in title >> T1-2017, or, if that title name is invalid, 1-2017. If I am Regkeepor, >> this is the official designation for that title; otherwise, I deputize >> for the Regkeepor to assign this designation. >> >> I then assign the ID T1-2017-1 (or, if that is invalid, 1-2017-1) to >> the only regulation in that title. If I am still not Regkeepor, I >> deputize for Regkeepor to do so, and then repeat the actions attempted >> in the previous paragraph. >> >> In accordance with Rule 2464, I repeal each regulation in title >> T1-2017 (or, if invalid, 1-2017). >> >> -Aris > >
