Your conditional doesn't meet it's own requirements. This arguably requires me to look through all CFJs, to make sure the doctrine hasn't been overturned. I therefore determine that you haven't submitted a proposal. I'd also just add it to the last paragraph, rather than making a new one.
-Aris On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think that's great for Agora but if its based on a CFJ or tradition, > that's more of the "implicit rules" (or "obscure rules") phenomenon which I > dislike. Conditional-ing stuff is as powerful as a real mechanic imo, and > one of the most powerful ones. Luckily proposals are real cheap now, and I > get rewarded for making good proposals, time to make it explicit! I'll pend > this next week once I get APs back. > > If adding conditions to actions performed via fora is a mechanic which is > explicitly acknowledged to exist in CFJs but not in the current Rules, I > create the following Proposal: > > Name: "Conditionaling" actions is a very useful mechanic > Content: Add to the rule "Fora" the following as a new paragraph at the > bottom of the rule: > > "Actions can be stated to be performed conditionally, if such conditions are > evaluable (by any player, with a reasonable amount of effort) at the time it > is stated and at any future moment from then. > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Oh, no, we definitely have conditional actioning (consider that a >> nonce). The condition just has to be evaluable at the time it is said, >> so no future conditionals. At least, that's my understanding. >> >> -Aris >> >> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Note: we have explicit conditional voting, but not conditional explicit >> > action-doing in general. >> > >> > I'm in favor of conditional action-doing in general because it's another >> > useful tool for doing stuff (...and the rules are silent on the issue). >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Aris Merchant >> > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> If there are no regulations, no part of this message beyond this >> >> paragraph has any effect. >> >> >> >> I determine the regulations for the recent tournament to be in title >> >> T1-2017, or, if that title name is invalid, 1-2017. If I am Regkeepor, >> >> this is the official designation for that title; otherwise, I deputize >> >> for the Regkeepor to assign this designation. >> >> >> >> I then assign the ID T1-2017-1 (or, if that is invalid, 1-2017-1) to >> >> the only regulation in that title. If I am still not Regkeepor, I >> >> deputize for Regkeepor to do so, and then repeat the actions attempted >> >> in the previous paragraph. >> >> >> >> In accordance with Rule 2464, I repeal each regulation in title >> >> T1-2017 (or, if invalid, 1-2017). >> >> >> >> -Aris >> > >> > > >
