Apology accepted. To be fair, it was reasonably clear for both of you, it's just that ais523 was replying to my message, which made me wonder.
-Aris On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:31 PM, grok (caleb vines) <grokag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oops. I didn't read the quote text and thought you were asking me. Sorry for > the snark, Aris > > > -grok > > > On Sep 6, 2017 7:28 PM, "grok (caleb vines)" <grokag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think the answer to that is pretty obvious. > > > -grok > > > On Sep 6, 2017 7:27 PM, "Aris Merchant" <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Mine, or nichdel's? Mine was sent to a-d, and is extremely vague (what > exactly is a 'provocation' anyway)? And no, there isn't a time limit, > although there is one potential way out of any SHALL at the moment. > > -Aris > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> Is there a time limit or other get-out on pledges at the moment? If >> not, this sort of indefinite promise could become problematic once it >> outlives its usefulness. >> >> -- >> ais523 > > >
