That's not how the Rule actually reads, even if it's more convenient. Please CFJ if you disagree with the plain reading of the rule:
- The win was announced over 14 days from when I deputized. - There was no open CFJ when the win was announced, nor when I deputized. On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I have read the rules. However, I believe the question is as to when the case > was closed. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >> Good point. Given the lack of a SHALL, no requirement was unfulfilled > >> and he didn’t take the office. If you want to CFJ this, you can, but > >> it seems clear to me. > > > > Read the rules pls. The SHALL requirement is in R649: > > A person > > permitted and enabled to award (revoke) a Patent Title SHALL do > > so in a timely fashion after the conditions authorizing em to do > > so are announced, unless there is an open judicial case > > contesting the validity of those conditions. > > > > Note there is some unclarity into what happens to the SHALL if there > > was an open case, but it's closed now. > > > > [Also: I'm a bit surprised at someone holding an office for a while > > being unfamiliar with their sole job with that office...] > > > > > >
