I have read the rules. However, I believe the question is as to when the case was closed. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> Good point. Given the lack of a SHALL, no requirement was unfulfilled >> and he didn’t take the office. If you want to CFJ this, you can, but >> it seems clear to me. > > Read the rules pls. The SHALL requirement is in R649: > A person > permitted and enabled to award (revoke) a Patent Title SHALL do > so in a timely fashion after the conditions authorizing em to do > so are announced, unless there is an open judicial case > contesting the validity of those conditions. > > Note there is some unclarity into what happens to the SHALL if there > was an open case, but it's closed now. > > [Also: I'm a bit surprised at someone holding an office for a while > being unfamiliar with their sole job with that office...] > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
