Quick, someone point a finger! Wish cards were appealable... On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> > > On Aug 23, 2017, at 10:04 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > More interestingly, I believe some of those are more than a week >> > > overdue. If failing to judge triggers the statute of limitations on >> > > the point the judgments become overdue, these might be invalid. >> > >> > It depends on whether failing to complete a duty in a timely fashion >> > is an infraction that happens at a specific time, or whether it happens >> > continuously until the duty is completed or obviated. I had a brief look >> > through the CFJ archives, but didn’t find any obvious candidates for >> > case law… anyone else? If not, do we need a CFJ to resolve this? >> >> My imperfect memory is that a there's a CFJ that says the rule is violated >> at the moment the clock expires, and it's a single violation that happens >> at that moment. >> >> Can't remember the statement context so some digging is needed. If anyone >> else also digs, for search purposes "In a timely fashion" used to be called >> "as soon as possible". >> >> -G. > > It's covered in three cases: CFJs 2393-2395. > > > >
-- >From V.J Rada
