<<<I point my finger at the following players for violating rule 591
Two fingers a week. The third is ineffective, although you can still "issue summary judgement" with no finger. Operative text "A player CANNOT point a finger more than twice per Agoran week, or more than once per Agoran week at the same player." "The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose Summary Judgment on a player by issuing a card to em by announcement." "The Referee CANNOT Point eir Finger or impose Summary Judgment more than five total times per week, or more than twice per week at or on the same player." There's no exception to the first rule. Luckily this is a CANNOT and the finger retraction doesn't change the card so you're good. On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:50 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > >> CFJs that are definitely overdue: >> >> by Quazie: 3542 (and 3550 but that has special circumstances) >> by Murphy: 3548 >> by omd: 3547, 3553 > > I point my finger at the following players for violating rule 591: > > * Quazie > * Murphy > * omd > > Having confirmed the information above, and as rule 591 (“Delivering > Judgement”) imposes a duty to judge in a timely fashion: > >> When a CFJ is open and assigned to a judge, that judge CAN assign a valid >> judgement to it by announcement, and SHALL do so in a timely fashion after >> this becomes possible. > > I issue each of the above-listed players a Green Card by summary judgement. > The overall lapse in Agoran activity renders the specific lapses harmless. > > -o > -- >From V.J Rada
