More interestingly, I believe some of those are more than a week overdue. If failing to judge triggers the statute of limitations on the point the judgments become overdue, these might be invalid.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:01 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > <<<I point my finger at the following players for violating rule 591 > > Two fingers a week. The third is ineffective, although you can still > "issue summary judgement" with no finger. > > Operative text > "A player CANNOT point a finger more than twice per Agoran week, or > more than once per Agoran week at the same player." > "The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose > Summary Judgment on a player by issuing a card to em by announcement." > "The Referee CANNOT Point eir Finger or impose Summary Judgment more > than five total times per week, or more than twice per week at or on > the same player." > > There's no exception to the first rule. Luckily this is a CANNOT and > the finger retraction doesn't change the card so you're good. > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: >> On Aug 23, 2017, at 9:50 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> CFJs that are definitely overdue: >>> >>> by Quazie: 3542 (and 3550 but that has special circumstances) >>> by Murphy: 3548 >>> by omd: 3547, 3553 >> >> I point my finger at the following players for violating rule 591: >> >> * Quazie >> * Murphy >> * omd >> >> Having confirmed the information above, and as rule 591 (“Delivering >> Judgement”) imposes a duty to judge in a timely fashion: >> >>> When a CFJ is open and assigned to a judge, that judge CAN assign a valid >>> judgement to it by announcement, and SHALL do so in a timely fashion after >>> this becomes possible. >> >> I issue each of the above-listed players a Green Card by summary judgement. >> The overall lapse in Agoran activity renders the specific lapses harmless. >> >> -o >> > > > > -- > From V.J Rada -- >From V.J Rada
