On Jul 20, 2017 10:02 PM, "Alex Smith" <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:52 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Jul 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <p.scr > > ibonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > I pend this for the minimum allowable amount. > > As the proposal’s imminence had already been flipped to Pending by > V.J Rada, I believe that this fails and will record that you paid > nothing to do nothing unless someone feels strongly enough to open a > CFJ. Does anyone know whether there's an existing CFJ on whether you can flip a switch to its own current value or not? It seems like the sort of thing that's almost certain to have come up at some point. Rule 2445 certainly allows you to pend a pending proposal, so the only way this failed is if the whole concept of "pending a pending proposal" is invalid due to the fact that nothing actually changes. -- ais523 I distinctly remember that switch question being a discussion, possibly a CFJ. I don't remember the results, just that I was on the wrong end of them. I will do some research in the morning when I'm less useless. -grok
