On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > Amend R2471 (No Faking) to read: > > > > A person SHALL NOT attempt to perform an action which e does not believe > > to be possible so as to deceive others.
What's the standard for belief. Like, if I'm 50/50 "eh, this might or might not work, the rules are silent"? (That's a pretty fair description on how I felt about the hashed pledge, for example). Written the above way, a 50/50 would mean that I don't fully believe it's possible, but I also don't believe it's impossible. Sill, that would mean Guilty under the proposed rule. If you wrote it "which e believes is IMPOSSIBLE" instead of "not believe to be possible", which is the same phrasing as the current rule, then the 50/50 case would be not guilty.
