I’d be in favour of reducing it from a month to a week or two. I’m especially sympathetic to your case, as your original action that lead to your bankruptcy could easily have been entirely ineffective, and therefore harmless.
-o > On Jul 22, 2017, at 11:39 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > While you're at it - bankruptcy sucks - being unable to work at all with > organizations for long periods of time is a pretty intense punishment. > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 14:58 Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com > <mailto:nich...@gmail.com>> wrote: > If I can, I withdraw the proposal "Less Strict Faking". Thank you and > sorry to anyone who lost shinies pending it. (Especially since I > realized I had 5 shinies after I asked people to pend it.) > > I'm currently rethinking not only this but the entire criminal justice > proposal. I do believe we need robust systems to deal with disruption, > that explicit reprimand is a useful tool, and that ameliorative > intervention (like tort law) is productive. But I question the > effectiveness of the current Card system, and I worry about the > direction of my own proposal; a complex criminal system surely wouldn't > look welcoming to newcomers, and might cause as much grief as it intends > to solve. Maybe I've taken a dark turn there. > > I think that Justice, in general, can use three tools: Punishment, > Rehabilitation, and Remedy. I think the first is the easiest to jump to > but also the least useful. Exclusionary punishment (limiting voting > power, CFJs, and even banishment) can prevent specific attacks but does > little to decrease the malice of an aggravated person and frequently > alienates the simply belligerent. > > Rehabilitation already exists in the current system, and I think all of > us have been pleasantly surprised at its success: Apologies. Maybe a > future criminal system should focus more closely on this. Maybe ALL > punishments should be reducable with Rehabilitory steps. > > Remedy is essentially all of tort law, and doesn't currently exist. If > we continue with pledges, orgs, and assets we definitely need it. But > like Punishment, it does little to enlighten or improve the mood of the > offender, and should be used when it helps to provide an overall sense > of fairness to the community. > > > On 07/13/17 15:37, Nic Evans wrote: > > I submit the following proposal: > > > > Title: Less Strict Faking > > AI: 1 > > Author: nichdel > > Co-authors: > > > > Amend R2471 (No Faking) to read: > > > > A person SHALL NOT attempt to perform an action which e does not believe > > to be possible so as to deceive others. > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
