No, I am specifically referring to the without 3 objection. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Jul 14, 2017, at 10:43 AM, grok (caleb vines) <grokag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> What about a system in which punishment packages were assigned without 3 >> objection or with Agoran Consent? The problem I see arising is that a player >> breaks the rules harming a second player, but then the game votes does not >> consent to punishing player one because they like em better than the second >> player. > > > isn't that exactly what the proto suggests? > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: >> That same officer takes all the finished cases and creates Punishment >> Packages. A Punishment Package is a list of effects, chosen from the >> list of appropriate punishments for each crime, that requires Agoran >> Consent. When a Punishment Package reaches Agoran Consent, its effects >> apply to the perp. > > > this reads as exactly what you're recommending and is the second > paragraph of the criminal court proto > > > -grok
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
