On Jan 16, 2017, at 8:19 PM, nichdel <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like the idea of re-introducing Assets. I would like to see Ribbons > and Trust Tokens properly defined as transferable assets, and ensure > that Organizations can hold them as well. The question there: who tracks > that activity? We either keep the current tracker for Ribbons and > introduce one for Tokens, and thereby have three different entities > tracking economic movement. Or we lump it all on the Secretary, making > it officially the most taxing (week to week) office.
I’m happy with the workload, but I’d strongly recommend splitting assets into their own office, separate from Organizations. I would _gladly_ stand to be elected for that office. I’ve been automating most of the work with tools like `ledger`. Preparing the actual reports is the most time-consuming part - I’m hoping I can convince ledger to either create the tables or spit out data in a format I can munge with Python, at which point the reports I’m responsible for become, for the most part, `make`. How do people feel about the formats of the reports today? -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
