> On Jan 15, 2017, at 3:26 AM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 8:57 PM, nichdel <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm currently looking into changes to organizations and agencies to simplify >> and bring them in line with the new economy. Could either include a contract >> system with that, or (the 'free market solution') someone could make an >> organization that emulates contracts by holding payments. > > I'm strongly of the opinion that we should have a contract system > that's actually binding. If you don't mind, I might try to write this > myself. I've gotta take a look through the archives and think about > it, so I'm not sure yet. I was just mentally trying to come up with a > few design suggestions for whoever implements this (you or someone > else), and I had so many that I thought it might make sense to have a > go at it myself. It's late here, so I'll think more about it tomorrow. > It's certainly bigger than anything I've attempted.
If you invent contracts, do you necessarily invent civil law to go with them? I know Agora’s had contract systems with teeth a few times, and every one I’ve been able to dig up has come with _some_ kind of empowered judiciary - even if it’s just making CFJ findings binding for contract disputes. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
