On 18/07/2013 12:17 AM, omd wrote:
Proposal: Down with bromides (AI=3)
Amend Rule 101 to read:
Please treat Agora right good forever.
[ i. is meaningless.
ii. was only considered to have an effect once, and it probably
shouldn't have been judged that way. It is unlikely to ever be
generally violated.
iii. and iv. are no fun.
v. is guaranteed elsewhere.
vi. is unlikely to ever be generally violated.
vii. is almost meaningless and common sense.]
I don't even see the point of iii. I realise there's history here, but
the rules don't define "agreements" anymore, so what does this do?
The only substantial technicality I see is iv.
The preamble and the subclauses have non-technical importance, of
course. As G. puts it, they set the tone.
-Dan