On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > I don't think this solves the problem. I think the problem is people > putting in switches without thinking about tracking, the requirement > to add "untracked" doesn't help. Also, I'm nervous about having > untracked switches in general.
Well, in this case it doesn't seem to be useful to track the adoption index and chamber of past proposals, but I suppose we could have the proposals and decisions cease to exist.
