On 28 June 2013 10:36, Fool <fool1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > In this case, the effect was your forfeiture (or requirement to forfeit). > It was based on events that occurred prior, but the effect was not > retroactive. >
I disagree. R345 describes a sequence of actions that lead to forfeiture. To avoid retroactive application, the entire sequence of events has to begin after R345 takes effect. Steve -- Steve Gardner Research Grants Development Faculty of Business and Economics Monash University, Caulfield campus Rm: S8.04 | ph: (613) 9905 2486 e: steven.gard...@monash.edu *** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on alternate Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). *** Two facts about lists: (1) one can never remember the last item on any list; (2) I can't remember what the other one is.
