Given that Charles Walker did vote FOR, it doesn't matter if Chuck did vote
AGAINST.

On 28 June 2013 00:00, Steven Gardner <steven.gard...@monash.edu> wrote:

> Charles Walker voted FOR and his vote is not recorded; Speaker Fool may
> have confused the two 'Charles's. I've no record of Chuck voting on this
> proposal publically, but e may of course have done so privately.
>
>
> On 27 June 2013 23:48, <games...@chuckcarroll.org> wrote:
>
>> > Proposal 344 (Yally) passes 5:3 with ehird, Steve, Michael, Yally, and
>> > Chuck FOR; Walker, Goethe, and omd AGAINST. This amends rule 343. It
>> > basically restores this poor rule to the original winning condition
>> > (most points), and adds a clause to resume the game next year. Yally
>> > gets 10 points by 332(a), Walker, Goethe, and omd get 5 by 332(b).
>> > ehird, Steve, Yally, Chuck, Walker, and omd get 5 by 332(c) since the
>> > last time they got points was 24 hours ago.
>>
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I voted against 344 - could you double-check that? (Alas,
>> I'm not currently at the location I'd need to be to access my copies of
>> outgoing mail, so I'm slightly less than 100% sure, but will be able to
>> check later.)
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Steve Gardner
> Research Grants Development
> Faculty of Business and Economics
> Monash University, Caulfield campus
> Rm: S8.04  |  ph: (613) 9905 2486
> e: steven.gard...@monash.edu
> *** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on
> alternate Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). ***
>
> Two facts about lists:
> (1) one can never remember the last item on any list;
> (2) I can't remember what the other one is.
>



-- 
Steve Gardner
Research Grants Development
Faculty of Business and Economics
Monash University, Caulfield campus
Rm: S8.04  |  ph: (613) 9905 2486
e: steven.gard...@monash.edu
*** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on alternate
Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). ***

Two facts about lists:
(1) one can never remember the last item on any list;
(2) I can't remember what the other one is.

Reply via email to