The argument (setting aside the retroactivity claim) is that Blob was immediately required to forfeit. Not doing so would to be sure be violation of the Rules, but it still can't happen unless Blob sends a message say that e forfeits.
On 28 June 2013 10:32, Fool <fool1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27/06/2013 8:19 PM, Malcolm Ryan wrote: > >> I call for judgment on the following statement: >> >> "At the 12:16am GMT on June 28 2013, Blob had not forfeited." >> >> Reasoning: The rules make it clear that forfeiting is a voluntary player >> action. Rule 345 says a player "must" forfeit. It does not say that they >> "are deemed to have forfeited". >> >> Blob >> >> > Must "immediately" forfeit, I'm afraid... > > -- Steve Gardner Research Grants Development Faculty of Business and Economics Monash University, Caulfield campus Rm: S8.04 | ph: (613) 9905 2486 e: steven.gard...@monash.edu *** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on alternate Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). *** Two facts about lists: (1) one can never remember the last item on any list; (2) I can't remember what the other one is.
