On Thu, 31 May 2012, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I agree on The President (I was re-reading the history when your first > > message came through). A fine point is I do still have to opine on whether > > the president satisfied the winning condition (though not on whether the > > victory announcement ratified the win). > > No, as the second case was as to whether omd won, not the President. > Perhaps you may find it useful to do so as part of a larger judgment, > but there is no requirement that you consider it.
What I mean is that, in the first case, ais523's fundamental question was whether you or The President "caused" the deregistration, so for me to consider whether you caused it, I'd also be considering whether the president caused it. The first case implicitly questions whether you, or the president (or both) win, which is why the later victory announcement is annoying (in that it was for a matter already under question via CFJ). -G.
