On Thu, 31 May 2012, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> (I don't know about the president vs. you yet, that's the hard part). > >> > >> -G. > > > > You don't have to judge whether the President won; e definitely did by > > self-ratification. > > > > -scshunt > > Also, I would argue Yally's CFJ did non constitute an 'explicit public > challenge' given the ambiguity in eir reference, and the convention > that one must explicitly indicate that one is doubting a > self-ratifying document when attempting to doubt it by CFJ.
Yes, I agree on The President (I was re-reading the history when your first message came through). A fine point is I do still have to opine on whether the president satisfied the winning condition (though not on whether the victory announcement ratified the win). I'll consider your second gratuitous note fairly I hope, it's worth considering (was also refreshing my memory on the "explicitness" ratification language as you were writing the above). -G.
