On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I agree on The President (I was re-reading the history when your first > message came through). A fine point is I do still have to opine on whether > the president satisfied the winning condition (though not on whether the > victory announcement ratified the win).
No, as the second case was as to whether omd won, not the President. Perhaps you may find it useful to do so as part of a larger judgment, but there is no requirement that you consider it. > I'll consider your second gratuitous note fairly I hope, it's worth > considering (was also refreshing my memory on the "explicitness" ratification > language as you were writing the above). > > -G. -scshunt
