On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Keba wrote: > Kerim Aydin wrote: > Nice. I thought about a "with N support" (or without N objetions) > phrase, but this way is much better. If there is anyone who wants to pay > a fee to make an Urgent Proposal undistributable. Maybe we should say > that undistribute a Urgent Proposal costs only one Erg?
I think this may tilt the balance a little towards the opponents of an urgent proposal. I'll keep it as 2 and maybe you can adjust it in your proposal? > Additionally, if you propose this, I‘ll propose a limit of Urgent > Proposals. "A player MAY NOT submit a Urgent Proposal, if there are > already N (or more) distributable Urgent Proposals in the Proposal > pool." What’s a good value for N? Maybe 3? Sounds like a plan, I'll make mine distributable after leaving it for others' comments for a day. -G.
