On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> But if you accept that, I can see that your logic works, PROVIDED
> it's accepted that Proposal wasn't adopted (R208 prevents ratification
> from doing that), none of the baggage (awards or whatever) that come
> from proposals being adopted happen, none of the NON-RULE CHANGE
> provisions of the proposal ("The value of X is hereby set to Y") work
> (because those require the proposal itself to take effect for their
> provisions to be implemented), and the Rule was created wholly by
> R1551 making the rule change, as R105 allows.Mm, why? If a proposal said "destroy all cards", why can't Rule 1551 destroy all cards? -- -c.
