On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 01/15/2010 10:04 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, comex wrote: >>> ...This will be a fun CFJ. Anyone remember off-hand if ratification >>> being broken would have ended the game at any point? >> >> I actually withdrew the CFJ because in abstract it was sounding too >> hypothetical. Anyone remember a relatively recent time when a voting >> report self-ratified and later turned out to be definitely incorrect? > > It may have occurred, but as I said before, I don't think that affects the > fact > that ratification, in the end, Does The Right Thing.
Look, I can't tell what you're arguing here. Whether or not it's a good thing to have, ratification doesn't have precedence over the proposal mechanism, and can't cause incorrect voting reports to make proposals be adopted. It's a straightforward conflict with R208, and R208 wins. How exactly does ratification get around a rule that directly contradicts it? -G.
