G. wrote: > Look, I can't tell what you're arguing here. Whether or not it's a good > thing to have, ratification doesn't have precedence over the proposal > mechanism, and can't cause incorrect voting reports to make proposals > be adopted. It's a straightforward conflict with R208, and R208 wins. > How exactly does ratification get around a rule that directly contradicts > it?
Ratification changes whether the R208 announcement was valid.
