On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > And it's not retroactive zeroing, it's just judging a week later whether > the account was zero. The two questions "did the action take place" and > "what were the resulting ergs" are just being answered late.
Ah, but according to your wording (and I wasn't sure whether this was intentional or not) it was the _claimant's_ ergs that would be zeroed. -- -c.