BobTHJ wrote: > I wasn't doing more than proto-ing this at the moment. However, out of > curiosity, why? In the past there was made an argument that permitting > the CotC to choose among the eligible judges allows assigning more > experienced judges to more difficult cases, etc. However, Judicial > Rank and favoring go a long way toward making sure appropriate judges > are assigned to each case. What's your argument for permitting the > CotC to maintain this selection?
It would do more to increase conflict-of-interest assignments (where the conflicted judge fails to disfavor) than to decrease scam assignments (which can still be appealed - well, except while dependent actions are broken, but that should be rare). Also, I'd need to use the dice server all the damn time; dealers apparently use undocumented randomizers without complaint, but then cards are generally lower-stakes.
