Roger Hicks wrote:
> On another note, if we were to adopt random judge selection from among
> eligible candidates, favoring a case could be changed to 'double' the
> chances of a paticular judge being selected. This would effectively
> un-break the automatic selection when a single judge favors a case.

I rather like the current situation where, if I'm not interested in a
case, I don't have to disfavor it as long as someone else favors it.

Perhaps favoring a case should have no effect if a judge is assigned
within four days after the CFJ is initiated.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to