Roger Hicks wrote: > On another note, if we were to adopt random judge selection from among > eligible candidates, favoring a case could be changed to 'double' the > chances of a paticular judge being selected. This would effectively > un-break the automatic selection when a single judge favors a case.
I rather like the current situation where, if I'm not interested in a case, I don't have to disfavor it as long as someone else favors it. Perhaps favoring a case should have no effect if a judge is assigned within four days after the CFJ is initiated.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature