On Thu, 4 Jun 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> Maybe we should be permitted to make people inactive by support (rather >>> than w/o objection) if they have not voted for N months or M proposals. >> >> As long as you can flip yourself back to Active by announcement, it >> wouldn't matter much either way. > > Proto: If a player has not cast a valid ballot on an Agoran Decision > in the past month, any player CAN, with 3 Support, flip that player's > activity to inactive. If a player's activity is flipped to inactive in > this manner, the next time e becomes active, if e did so through eir > own action, e SHALL cast a valid ballot on the next Agoran Decision > initiated in which e has a positive voting limit.
I know it's unimaginable now; but in past we've gone through slow periods with many fewer distributions (even none for two months). It's slowing down now due to distributability. To prevent us from all suddenly being able to all make each other inactive, make it "missed all votes in the past month AND missed votes on at least the last N proposals (suboption "last N that failed quorum", therefore only triggering it when its an issue). -G.
