On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Arguments in my defense: > > While ais523 was able to find one proposal that was in the pool that > was not in the published report, simply adding that proposal to the > report would not have guaranteed the accuracy of the report, any more > than my looking through the last 2 months of the public fora to find > missing proposals guaranteed this. We still don't know if there are > more missing proposals, and considering the fact that we don't have a > complete archive of messages that have been sent to the public fora in > the past, it may be impossible to ever be sure of the "correct" status > of the pool. comex's earlier assertion that the ability to find a > single proposal and thus produce a "more correct" report is nonsense; > a report is either correct or incorrect. While there's now proof that > the report was incorrect, it's still unclear that a fully correct > report can be produced.
The Proposal Pool was ratified on 28 April 2003, between which date and now I believe we have a complete archive of public messages, but of course I'm not expecting you to search 6 years of archives for proposals. Rule 2202 does not require a correct report, only a corrected one. It was clear, at the time you ratified the report, that the report was incorrect and could have been corrected by adding almost-5269 to the pool.
