On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 17:41 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > While ais523 was able to find one proposal that was in the pool that > was not in the published report, simply adding that proposal to the > report would not have guaranteed the accuracy of the report, any more > than my looking through the last 2 months of the public fora to find > missing proposals guaranteed this. We still don't know if there are > more missing proposals, and considering the fact that we don't have a > complete archive of messages that have been sent to the public fora in > the past, it may be impossible to ever be sure of the "correct" status > of the pool. comex's earlier assertion that the ability to find a > single proposal and thus produce a "more correct" report is nonsense; > a report is either correct or incorrect. While there's now proof that > the report was incorrect, it's still unclear that a fully correct > report can be produced.
Personally, I'm just disappointed that the proposal in question was never distributed. Maybe we should resubmit it? -- ais523
