On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 18:57 -0400, comex wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > Gratuitous: As judge didn't notice the ratification attempt; if I > > had noticed it I would have delayed the judgement to avoid the issue. > > Since the judgement found that, to the best of available evidence, > > there had been no ratifications in a long time and at least one > > longstanding error, means that (if the Promotor had not ratified) > > e would be publishing documents that e knew were likely to contain > > other errors, so e would not be able to avoid breaching the rules > > in a manner at least as serious. -G. > > E could avoid breaching the rules by making a proposal to remove stale > proposals from the pool.
Not only that, e /did/ make a proposal to remove stale proposals from the pool... -- ais523
