On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Taral <tar...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This was sent two hours after Goethe's judgement that a certain other >> proposal existed in the pool. Accordingly, NoV: Wooble violated R2202 >> and committed the Class-8 Crime of Endorsing Forgery by knowingly >> using Ratification Without Objection to ratify a (prior to >> ratification) incorrect document when a corrected document could be >> produced with reasonable effort. > > I contest this.
I initiate a criminal CFJ, noting that the Accused had plenty of warning and the opportunity to avoid violating the rule.
