On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>> One additional point of order - Proposal N is not generally the name of
>> an entity; for maximum clarity, Distributed Proposal N should be used.
>
> How do you figure? (There was a CFJ on this matter, but when I
> tracked it down - 1358 - it turned out to be less specific than
> I expected.)
I believe e's referring to the situation created by relatively recent
amendments:
Distributed proposals have ID numbers, to be assigned by the
Promotor.
...
(f) If an instance of that type has an ID number, then its name
is the combination of its type and ID number. Otherwise, it
has no name.
