On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aaron Goldfein wrote: > > I vote as follows: > > > > 6187: AGAINST [the formula is broken for several instances, including > > especially if the number of active players is very low) > > 6188: PRESENT > > 6189: FOR > > 6190: FOR > > > > -Yally > > > The formula is designed to require a sufficient number of players to > pass the proposal with everyone else voting AGAINST. Remember that the > initiator of the action cannot support; therefore with even three active > players, a proposal with adoption index 2 would normally require 2 votes > (2:1): floor((2*3)/(2+1)) = 1. > > If you can find another bug, I'd appreciate you pointing it out. > If there are two active players, then two votes would be required to pass a proposal. So if a proposal then had adoption index of 3, it would be : 3*2/(3+1) = 6/4 = 1. And also, what about ordinary decisions?
