On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:37 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > Oh, so you're interpreting R2150 as "must include". Again, though, this > is trivially satisfied by your theoretical ability to hire one or more > sufficiently competent human translators.
Is a theoretical ability enough, though? For instance, I'm not certain that I could afford to hire a competent translator for enough time to meaningfully participate in Agora. I agree that I probably am, indeed, a person; I just thought this would serve as a good subject for a random stray CFJ (which apparently doesn't exist, despite the intent being clear enough?) This does actually bring up an interesting question: If someone non-English submits a proposal, CFJ, or other such document in their native language (it being translated), what counts as the "official" proposal? The translated version? -- ais523
