On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 08:07 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > > Well, one thing that worries me is that with democratisation possible > > while voting isn't, the Assessor gets quite a lot of power over whether > > ordinary proposals are adopted or not. (I am reminded of proposal 5707; > > incidentally, it could have been defeated with 2 support at pretty much > > any time in October, but nobody thought of retrying the original failed > > attempt to democratise.) > > I've thought that for a bit. I submit the following proposal, > No ex-post-suffragium democracy, AI-2 please: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Amend Rule 2142 (Support Democracy) by inserting the text "in its voting > period" immediately after the text "ordinary decision" > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
You beat me to it. -- ais523
