On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:17 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > Well, one thing that worries me is that with democratisation possible > > while voting isn't, the Assessor gets quite a lot of power over whether > > ordinary proposals are adopted or not. (I am reminded of proposal 5707; > > incidentally, it could have been defeated with 2 support at pretty much > > any time in October, but nobody thought of retrying the original failed > > attempt to democratise.) > > I thought we did retry it, but the other side tried to resolve it first > and were eventually found to have succeeded?
Ah, maybe it was something like that. It was a while ago now, I'd have to look up the details. (Luckily, it's long since self-ratified so we don't have to worry about any gamestate recalculation it might have lead to.) -- ais523
