ais523 wrote:
> It has two + mills, I'm pretty sure; at least it did last I checked,
> did one get demolished by water rights or something? I'll see if I
> can dig out the last published AAA report to check.
It seems that you missed land #0 (a + mill) off a report sometime in
October; it had it at the start of October but not at the end of
October, with no obvious way to have lost it in the meantime (unless
it was destroyed by a late water rights enforcement at the start of
October, I didn't check for that). This has since self-ratified; but
if the + mill in question was destroyed accidentally by ratification,
we should probably equity to get it back.

-- 
ais523

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to