ais523 wrote: > It has two + mills, I'm pretty sure; at least it did last I checked, > did one get demolished by water rights or something? I'll see if I > can dig out the last published AAA report to check. It seems that you missed land #0 (a + mill) off a report sometime in October; it had it at the start of October but not at the end of October, with no obvious way to have lost it in the meantime (unless it was destroyed by a late water rights enforcement at the start of October, I didn't check for that). This has since self-ratified; but if the + mill in question was destroyed accidentally by ratification, we should probably equity to get it back.
-- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>