Goethe wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
>>> ps. Equity originally took the place of crimes and infractions,
>> Agora however is somewhat lazy, as most equity cases have been judged {}. :/
>>
> Yah, turns out no one wants to bother with coming up with suitable
> and interesting "community services" for rules infractions or suitable
> equity adjustments in contracts, easier to just call something a
> "Class-3 infraction" and be done with it. Worthy experiment but I
> fully admit it was misguided. -G.
A detailed review of past equity judgements suggests otherwise:
1811 -> "pay with interest"
1825 -> "pay something similar to what you can't"
1832 -> "do something similar to what you didn't"
1886 -> "null, one party forgives you and the others are n/a"
1915 -> "catch up faster"
1927 -> "catch up faster"
1932 -> "null, apart from an attempted points scam"
2036 -> "null, the point of the AFO is to allow things like this"
2038 -> "stay in the Racket until it forces you to break the rules"
2039 -> "null, no substantive inequity, no intent to misbehave"
2052 -> "null, they had no such obligations"
2067 -> "null, none of this was not envisioned"
2100 -> "pay without scamming"
2108 -> "catch up faster"
2119 -> "add a time limit"
2148 -> "null, no substantive inequity, no intent to self-enrich"
2158 -> "try one more time"
