On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No objection, and general approval, to a rule giving a bard a win >> if e manages weekly displays of wit, poetry, etc. with some >> approval method for quality (e.g. through proposal). I'm just not >> sure if "constant proposals to amend rules" is the way to go. > That's the way Mad Scientist currently works. Based on your > observations of that office, how do you recommend the mechanic be > altered?
Not really. The Mad Scientist's weekly duty is just to create the proposal. There's also some useless verbiage about how the proposal constitutes the Mad Scientist's report if it's adopted, but that portion of eir duties is always either absent or trivially fulfilled. -root
