On Friday 24 October 2008 11:29:50 am Kerim Aydin wrote: > I don't mind a weekly proposal, but completing eir monthly reports > is dependent on voters wanting their rules to rhyme? Not an office > I'd personally take. I assume that if voters don't want their rules to rhyme then this proposal won't pass. Also, line 11 protects the Poet Laureate from litigation if eir proposals fail.
> No objection, and general approval, to a rule giving a bard a win > if e manages weekly displays of wit, poetry, etc. with some > approval method for quality (e.g. through proposal). I'm just not > sure if "constant proposals to amend rules" is the way to go. That's the way Mad Scientist currently works. Based on your observations of that office, how do you recommend the mechanic be altered? Pavitra
